There is new ho-e and confidence in Washington that the war in Afghanistan will end soon. Some think that the Taliban does not really want peace but I am inclined to see things just a little bit differently.
They are just as sick of the war as the Americfan public is. They have been taking a serious beating from the US drone campaign and they are desperate for members which is evident by the fact that they have been kidnapping children and forcing them to work as suicide bombers.
The talks have not begun yet but the US and the Taliban are both in the process of establishing ground rules for any interactions that they will have. If the peace talks ever come into fruition they would include the United States, the Taliban and the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai.
The diplomatic, military and intelligence branches of the U.S. government differ over the value of talks with the Taliban or whether now is the right time to so publicly shift focus away from the ongoing military campaign that primarily targets Taliban insurgents. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and some uniformed military leaders recently have sounded some of the strongest notes of caution, especially on when to grant Taliban requests for the transfer of several of its prisoners from the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, military and other U.S. officials said.
We need to keep the pressure of the drone attacks on them at all costs because any let up will give them an incentive not to be serious about peace. We owe it to all of our military ring customers who are fighting the war to give them every possible opportunity for success.
The latest Afghan National Intelligence Estimate warns that the Taliban will grow stronger, using the talks to gain credibility and run out the clock until U.S. troops depart Afghanistan, while continuing to fight for more territory, say U.S. officials who have read the classified document. They spoke on condition of anonymity to describe the roughly 100-page review, an amalgam of intelligence community’s predictions of possible scenarios for the Afghan war through the planned end of U.S. combat in 2014.
It says the Afghan government largely has failed to prove itself to its people and likely will continue to weaken and find influence only in the cities. It predicts that the Taliban and warlords will largely control the countryside. The NIE did suggest that eliminating top Taliban leaders in the next two years and continuing to build the Afghan government could help offset that.
Meanwhile, Karzai is still uneasy with the pace and direction of talks. He worries that the United States will strike a deal with the Taliban and force that deal on his government, two Afghan officials told The Associated Press, speaking on condition of anonymity to describe sensitive discussions.
U.S. officials close to the negotiations say that despite these warnings the Taliban high command is more ready for talks than in the past, at least with the United States if not the elected Afghan government it opposes.
One sign was the surprising public endorsement by the Taliban of the plan to open a negotiating office in the Persian Gulf state of Qatar. But U.S. officials also cite more subtle indications of a shift toward peace negotiations, including the recent participation in preliminary talks of more senior and influential Taliban representatives.
The senior U.S. official said negotiators are now confident they are talking to credible intermediaries for the main Taliban command based in Pakistan.
The administration’s top negotiator, Marc Grossman, was building support for talks among regional allies such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia this week, to be followed by discussions with Taliban representatives, U.S. and other government officials said.
One topic was expected to be a U.S. offer to release two or three Taliban prisoners from Guantanamo to custody in Qatar, although two officials said that effort is moving more slowly than plans for the office. A waiting period would follow that transfer before any other Taliban transfers would be considered. U.S. officials said Congress would be consulted throughout.
The Taliban had sought both the office and the prisoner release as preconditions for real talks.
The senior U.S. official said the U.S. has set clear conditions for opening the office, including that the Taliban must agree not to use it for fundraising or propaganda, or to run insurgent operations. Larger conditions include assurances that the insurgents are truly interested in a political settlement and not using negotiations as a way to stall until U.S. forces leave.
The central political office confers instant, though controversial, legitimacy on the diffuse insurgency as a political movement and provides a site for formal talks. The idea is to give the Taliban room to negotiate in a location with less direct pressure from Pakistan, which has ties to some militant groups and houses parts of the Taliban leadership.
The U.S. intelligence assessment looks beyond the near horizon for talks.
It predicts the likely outcome of two strategies:
** Moderate engagement, in which the U.S. continues special operations raids against key Taliban leaders, and village outreach to strengthen local government, while conventional forces train Afghanistan’s army and police force.
** Limited engagement, in which the U.S. would continue economic and political support, and some Afghan security training, but most troops would withdraw.
Both strategies can weaken the Taliban, the analysts say, but ultimately neither course of action is likely to stop the continued weakening of the Afghan state, the officials said.
In that way, the NIE’s bleak predictions also give the White House reason to hasten the reconciliation process in order to pull U.S. troops out of what some analysts termed a hopeless stalemate.
– Associated Press writers Deb Riechmann in Kabul and Kathy Gannon in Islamabad contributed to this report.
